Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 23:01:59 GMT -6
ARegulation on the application of Law no. the assessment of the seriousness of the act and the sanction was done by the governing bodies of the National Union of Notaries Public. . Unlike the previous text by amending art. of Law no. by Law no. and Law no. the provision included in the current form of art. para. lit. f which stipulates that the capacity of a notary public ceases when a final court decision has ordered the conviction or postponement of the application of the punishment for the commission of service crimes or in connection with the service or for the intentional commission of another crime.
Correspondingly paragraph was also modified. of art. which became para. from art. Country Email List which establishes that the Minister of Justice can order in this case the termination of the capacity of notary public ex officio. . The difference between the two legal norms is obvious to the extent that in the form from the date the act was committed it was to be assessed if the act constituted a serious crime or if it affected the prestige of the profession in the case of the applicant it was about the punishment with a fine without suspending any rights or exercising the function and in the current form the commission of crimes with intent automatically leads to the termination of the notary status.
He considers that he is in a situation where an analysis of the principle of nonretroactivity can be made because there is a real conflict of laws in time considering the provisions of art. para. of Constitution regarding the nonretroactivity of the civil law to the extent that the acts were committed in and the sanctions applied were those included in the laws enacted later. . of the Constitutional Court at the infraconstitutional level.
Correspondingly paragraph was also modified. of art. which became para. from art. Country Email List which establishes that the Minister of Justice can order in this case the termination of the capacity of notary public ex officio. . The difference between the two legal norms is obvious to the extent that in the form from the date the act was committed it was to be assessed if the act constituted a serious crime or if it affected the prestige of the profession in the case of the applicant it was about the punishment with a fine without suspending any rights or exercising the function and in the current form the commission of crimes with intent automatically leads to the termination of the notary status.
He considers that he is in a situation where an analysis of the principle of nonretroactivity can be made because there is a real conflict of laws in time considering the provisions of art. para. of Constitution regarding the nonretroactivity of the civil law to the extent that the acts were committed in and the sanctions applied were those included in the laws enacted later. . of the Constitutional Court at the infraconstitutional level.